First of all, I just want to say thanks to everyone complimenting our photographs during the trip. It really means a lot to me and Lucy.
On our cross country trip, I was fortunate enough to have Olympus lend me a camera for our trip. They over nighted the camera to me before we left on the trip and I got to test out one of the most travel-friendly interchangeable lens cameras out there. I was lent the Olympus EPL1, a mirrorless micro-4/3rd’s camera (which I’ll explain in a moment, but what it mainly means is that it’s compact). They also lent me the Olympus m.Zuiko 14-150mm, their flagship compact travel lens.
Trade-offs of a PEN-series Camera
Olympus recently released the retro-styled EP1, EP2, and EPL-1 and was keenly looked upon by many photographers because what it gave up in sensor size and optical view finders, it made up with a body the size of a point-and-shoot pocket camera and small lenses. The PEN series stays extremely compact because of it’s lack of an optical viewfinder and it’s micro-4/3rd sensor.
The way a normal large digital camera works is with a single-reflex lens (SLR) that allows you to see what your lens sees by reflecting the image off of a mirror into an optical viewfinder. The PEN series took out that mirror and shows you a purely digital image on its back (or through a supplemental viewfinder, which you can purchase separately). This comes with compromises for the photographer. If you’ve ever had to use an LCD screen in the sun, you know it can be difficult to see. That’s the trade-off—you have to view from the LCD screen but you get a camera body the size of a point-and-shoot.
The micro-4/3rds sensor doesn’t as much affect the size of the camera body as it does the lenses. Because the sensor is smaller than a normal DSLR sensor, the lenses can be smaller because it doesn’t have to fill up the same amount of space as a larger camera. The trade-off is that larger sensors have more pixels which means more detail in your images and better noise reduction on high ISO images.
What I Loved About the EPL1 + 14-150mm
Size. I’ve been shooting with DSLR’s and Medium Format cameras for so long now, I’ve forgotten how the size of the camera can affect your shooting. And I’ve read plenty of reviews where people talk about this so I think it may just be something that you have to try for yourself to see, but I was more likely to take the camera more places because of its size. You also don’t think about the weight of a normal DSLR with lenses (5-10 lbs) until you’re carrying this 1-1.5 lbs camera on a 3+ mile hike. On a trip like this, where all of our luggage was in a backpack and a small carry-on, the camera with it’s batteries and cables took up less than half the space as our Nikon D90 which we also took with us.
Colors. The in-camera image processing is also one of the best I’ve used. The colors and vibrancy of photos that I would get straight out of the camera blow the Canon, Nikon, and Pentax digital cameras I’ve shot with over the years. Skies were bluer, plants were greener… and it’s not necessarily easy to reproduce with other cameras in post processing. Trust me. When I was editing the Nikon images next to the Olympus, they didn’t have the same punch. Now, take into account that there are people who don’t like that much punch, but if you do, Olympus is a great brand to consider.
Detail and Sharpness. I was expecting to have to use the 14-150mm around the 25-60mm range most of the trip, but the impact the 14mm had sold me. I ended up staying on the wide-end of the lens the majority of the trip. While you have to remember, these shots aren’t going to be blown up and hung in galleries per se, they could easily be printed large without much of distortion and a good amount of detail. There’s caveats to this, though, and I had to shoot the majority of the time between ISO 100-200 to avoid noise and loss of detail. I’ll discuss that more later. In Yellowstone where we were shooting a lot of wildlife, I wasn’t expecting much from the 150mm end, but again, I was pleasantly surprised. Zoomed all the way out, it was still sharp (dependent on the location of the subject), like the image of the rabbit.
Where the EPL-1 Could Improve.
ISO Performance. I’m not a huge pixel peeper, so this isn’t coming from a geeky place, but even for me, RAW images above ISO 200 were pretty rough. It wasn’t just the noise (which was pretty heavy on that low of ISO) but the loss of detail that comes with it. When I’m shooting on the run, I normally let the Nikon D90 auto ISO for me, which you can set it’s limits. However, I couldn’t find these options on the EPL1 and it would shoot up to ISO 1600 which was unacceptable in most cases. So most of the time I left it set at around ISO 100 which changed my shooting style, but maybe for the better. However, since the LCD is better in lower light, it couldn’t perform fast enough in low light.
Dials. The EPL1 is a cheaper version of the EP1 and EP2 so there are compromises in the body, one of which is a basic dial. To adjust the aperture, shutter speed, etc., you have to look at the back of the screen and learn the circular push menu to change these basic functions. I can’t imagine it takes that much to add a dial to the camera, so it must just be a selling point to make you spend a few extra hundred for the EP1. Not cool. That said, I adapted to the on-screen changes pretty quickly as you’re not looking through a viewfinder all the time like with a DSLR.
Depth of Field. The 14-150mm is not a fast lens, f/4 at the wide end, f/5.6 at the long end. At the wide end, it’s pretty tough to get any DOF and at the long end, it’s pretty slow to get great DOF. I won’t go into other lenses available, but on the whole, there’s not a lot of fast lenses for m43 cameras at this point in time. It’s one of those things that influenced my shooting style during the trip, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but realistically it just means you have a lack of choice. If they made a faster 14-150mm, it would be twice the size or more which would defeat it’s compact being.
How the EPL1 Changed My Shooting Style
As you’ve read in my short review here, the EPL1′s limitations forced me to shoot in ways I don’t normally shoot. I’m typically a close shooter… portraits, macro, wildlife, etc. It’s just what I enjoy shooting. The trip was very scenic, though, and I had a camera that excelled in wide shots and couldn’t shoot over ISO 200. So I became a landscape photographer and it was a lot of fun. An unintended consequence of restrictions but at the same time, the EPL1 really shined here. If it wasn’t for using it every day for an entire month, some reviewers may get put off by some of it’s limitations, but for me, it sold me on the fact that it’s an awesome travel camera with a lot of positives. While the larger cameras allow you more options, you also have to lug it around everywhere and make more space for it.
When we were in Yellowstone, it was funny to see me with this tiny camera compared to these guys with their gigantic guns. You would see these people lugging 20+ lbs camera/lenses worth more than $10k-15k to take images of bears and wolves that were so far away they’re barely visible to the human eye. In the end, awesome cameras and lenses and all, they’re not going to get that awesome portrait of the wolf’s face or bear snarling like in our magazines. You still have to be close to the animals. So I just smile and laughed on the inside because I loved the shots I was taking and I didn’t have to lug these monsters around the park.
Final Thoughts
The EPL1 and the 14-150mm lens were a perfect combo for a travel camera. A pro photographer may consider this more of a “fun” camera as it does have it’s limitations, but as an art director who looks at hundreds of photos every issue, the quality of these images are publishable. On a billboard? Maybe not. But for travel photography and just general walking around, I would recommend this camera. It’s about knowing how the tool is used best. I look forward to an improvement in high ISO shooting and some faster lenses (though, with adapters, you can put all sorts of old small film lenses on it).
For me, it was priceless as it made me look at how I shoot and get a new perspective that could have been overlooked before the trip. I loved not swapping lenses off and on constantly. If the high ISO performance was better, though, I could have taken it into more indoor places as it’s low profile gets less looks from other customers and is perfect for when you’re just hanging out with friends.
Read more about the EPL1 at Olympus’ website: www.olympusamerica.com.